Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1677 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3570 - 184 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - CA$42.99 vs CA$132.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-7100 - CA$0.25 vs CA$0.72 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$132.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$132.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
172
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |