Buy on Amazon
CA$62.92
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $194
Availability
MSRP in USD: $194
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 185 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1620 - 118 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-3570 - CA$32.99 vs CA$62.92
- Up to 45% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3570 - CA$0.29 vs CA$0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 55 vs 77 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
118
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
54%
Price, CA$
CA$62.92
52%
FPS Winner
Intel Core I5-3570 I5 3570 3.4 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 6M 77W LGA 1155
Buy for CA$62.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1056 minutes ago
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
114
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1057 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
