Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 699 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1840 - 168 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i5-3570 - CA$41.21 vs CA$42.99
- Up to 4% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-3570 - CA$0.25 vs CA$0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 53 vs 77 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
168
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
96%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
95%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12950 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
166
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12950 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |