Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is 1490 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Performs up to 28% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3900 - 323 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
252
78.0185758513932%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$67.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
52.722323049001815%
Multi-Core
992
32.228719948018195%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Not Available | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |