Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is 2910 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Performs up to 43% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6100 - 323 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
226
69.96904024767801%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |