Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 675 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$142.95 vs CA$181.91
- Up to 23% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$0.27 vs CA$0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 3 3200G - 526 vs 522 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
522
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15407 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
526
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.35/FPS
77%
Price, CA$
CA$181.91
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$181.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |