Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 3117 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 37% better in Starfield than FX-6100 - 59 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 34% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - CA$98.43 vs CA$150.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 3 3100 - CA$2.29 vs CA$2.54 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
59
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.54/FPS
90%
Price, CA$
CA$150
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
43
72%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |