Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1938 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 7% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8350 - 191 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - CA$182.45 vs CA$280.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 3 2200G - CA$1.02 vs CA$1.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
191
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.47/FPS
69%
Price, CA$
CA$280
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
179
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |