Buy on Amazon
CA$67.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2714 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Phenom X4 9550 - 251 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
251
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$67.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2517 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
40.27538726333907%
Multi-Core
712
71.7741935483871%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
