Buy on Amazon
CA$84.01
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-6100 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 1294 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom X4 9550 - 114 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
114
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$84.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2510 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
61.417322834645674%
Multi-Core
712
58.16993464052288%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | FX |
| Agena | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
