Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2304 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 42% better in Immortals of Aveum than Phenom II X4 925 - 27 vs 19 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$67.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Deneb | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |