Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 2304 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Phenom II X4 925 - 103 vs 88 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
103
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$54.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$54.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
26.800670016750416%
Multi-Core
930
39.81164383561644%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
Deneb | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |