Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2067 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8370 - 191 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than FX-8370 - CA$349.79 vs CA$420.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8370 - CA$1.83 vs CA$2.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$420 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15431 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$349.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$349.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |