Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1840 outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1840 is 124 days older than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than FX-8370 - 606 vs 604 FPS
- Up to 88% cheaper than FX-8370 - CA$41.21 vs CA$342.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Minecraft than FX-8370 - CA$0.07 vs CA$0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$342 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7209 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
606
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |