Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - CA$41.21 vs CA$393.45
- Up to 88% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-11900KF - CA$0.25 vs CA$2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Deathloop than Celeron G1840 - 191 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
168
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8118 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
191
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.06/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$393.45
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$393.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |