Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3180 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - CA$41.21 vs CA$489.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 9 7900 - CA$0.25 vs CA$2.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 21% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1840 - 201 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 24 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
166
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.43/FPS
10%
Price, CA$
CA$489
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |