Buy on Amazon
CA$41.21
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $319
Availability
MSRP in USD: $319
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3071 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$41.21 vs CA$278.98
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 268% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1840 - 92 vs 25 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 20 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1840 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.8 GHz 2M 53W LGA1150
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-13600K Desktop Processor 14 cores (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) 24M Cache, up to 5.1 GHz
Buy for CA$278.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i5-13600K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
18.94934333958724%
Multi-Core
854
5.751616379310344%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
