Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1591 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - CA$182.45 vs CA$404.81
- Up to 51% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 7 1700 - CA$0.89 vs CA$1.82 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 9% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-8350 - 223 vs 205 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
205
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
223
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.82/FPS
48%
Price, CA$
CA$404.81
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$404.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |