Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2004 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320 - 201 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$142.72 vs CA$239.75
- Up to 44% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320 - CA$0.71 vs CA$1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$239.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |