Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2746 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8320 - 132 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$139.59 vs CA$239.75
- Up to 48% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8320 - CA$1.06 vs CA$2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$239.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$139.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$139.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |