Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2825 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - CA$93.19 vs CA$485.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 36% better in Rust than FX-8150 - 208 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 24 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Buy for CA$485 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |