Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - CA$87.12 vs CA$386.61
- Up to 72% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i7-11700F - CA$1.12 vs CA$4.07 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 22% better in Remnant II than FX-8150 - 95 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
78
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
95
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.07/FPS
27%
Price, CA$
CA$386.61
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$386.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |