Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - CA$87.12 vs CA$395.34
- Up to 74% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-11900 - CA$0.46 vs CA$1.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 18% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-8150 - 221 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
188
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
221
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.79/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$395.34
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$395.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |