Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 74% better in War Thunder than FX-8300 - 226 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - CA$83.46 vs CA$385.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-11900 - CA$0.64 vs CA$1.7 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
226
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.7/FPS
37%
Price, CA$
CA$385
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$385 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18012 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
130
57%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18011 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |