Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 3211 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - CA$87.12 vs CA$533.13
- Up to 81% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i9-10850K - CA$0.56 vs CA$2.88 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 19% better in Resident Evil 4 than FX-8150 - 185 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
155
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.88/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$533.13
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$533.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |