Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 461 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 10% better in Starfield than Core i3-9100F - 64 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - CA$77.99 vs CA$512.86
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$512.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 283 minutes ago
Buy for CA$77.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 283 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
78.96551724137932%
Multi-Core
3669
40.33641160949868%
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |