Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$87.12 vs CA$474.72
- Up to 77% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-10900KF - CA$0.15 vs CA$0.64 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Minecraft than FX-8150 - 746 vs 597 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
597
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
746
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$474.72
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |