Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - CA$87.12 vs CA$369.68
- Up to 73% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i9-11900KF - CA$0.19 vs CA$0.7 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8150 - 528 vs 450 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
450
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
528
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
27%
Price, CA$
CA$369.68
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$369.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |