Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 565 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6100 - 108 vs 106 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
106
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |