Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2080 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6350 - 106 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
106
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$148.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$148.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |