Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - CA$66.51 vs CA$466.14
- Up to 82% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 5 3600X - CA$0.37 vs CA$2.07 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 26% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-6300 - 225 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
178
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6331 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
225
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.07/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$466.14
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$466.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |