Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - CA$82.49 vs CA$385.0
- Up to 2% better value when playing Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Core i9-11900 - CA$2.36 vs CA$2.42 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 354% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than FX-6100 - 159 vs 35 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
35
22%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$82.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$82.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5960 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.42/FPS
97%
Price, CA$
CA$385
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$385 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |