Buy on Amazon
CA$120.26
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 855 days newer than the more expensive FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than FX-4350 - 215 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than FX-4350 - CA$67.21 vs CA$120.26
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
CPU Processor FX-Series FX4350 FX-4350 FX 4350 4.2 GHz 125W Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4350FRW4KHK Socket AM3+ Good Performance, high Efficiency, Clear Picture
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$67.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
