Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 3172 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - CA$120.26 vs CA$149.0
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4350 - 204 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Buy for CA$149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |