Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2045 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Remnant II than FX-4130 - 80 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 54 vs 125 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |