Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8150 is 320 days older than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-4130 - 90 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
90
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |