Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 57 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 2% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-4130 - 59 vs 58 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 6 vs 4 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
59
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |