Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2605 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon X5690 - 156 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5690 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5951 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5690 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |