Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5680 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5680 is 1386 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Performs up to 0% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G1820 - 225 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
224
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |