Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5680 outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5680 is 982 days older than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |