Buy on Amazon
$48.1
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 2515 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 5% better in Apex Legends than Xeon X5680 - 271 vs 259 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
271
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3 i3-7100T Dual-Core (2 Core) 3.40 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
