Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2692 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon X5680 - 154 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 64 vs 12 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | EPYC |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 32 |
| 12 | Threads | 64 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
