Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 846 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Xeon X5675 - 226 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |