Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3431 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon X5675 - 137 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 24 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$355
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $355 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |