Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 3451 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon X5675 - 210 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8906 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |