Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3363 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 19% better in Valorant than Xeon X5675 - 816 vs 687 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5675 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
816
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$430
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $430 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |