Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2327 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3690
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon W3690 - 172 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3690 - 64 vs 12 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | EPYC |
Gulftown | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |