Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3680 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3680 is 952 days older than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-6300 - 100 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6597 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |