Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 1765 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 23% better in Starfield than Xeon W3565 - 54 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |