Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 3917 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Xeon W3550 - 217 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 58 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon W3550
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
